News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Stock Stallion

08/26/08 12:17 PM

#116208 RE: righty #116204

1000000% agree and that is my ONLY complaint. We have heard all the suggestion on how to slam us now lets her something from ADMIN addressing the TOU as it PERTAINS to us?
icon url

IRISHBULL

08/26/08 12:17 PM

#116209 RE: righty #116204

3- How do they plan to deal with the real problems of non-disclosing promoters?......... I'm not a betting man, BUT I'll bet a million bucks that the current disclosing promoters know most, if not all the non disclosing paid promoters and they will out them.
icon url

greedy__malone

08/26/08 12:28 PM

#116217 RE: righty #116204

nondisclosing promoters is a violation of SEC rules and if you read the TOU you will see that legal disclosures is the duty of the promoter. If the promoter wants to circumvent SEC rules then they have to accept the possible ramifications if caught.

Believe me, I am not the only one who follows, logs and researches stock promotion and scams.

And the extra fee should be steep. Very steep if you ask me.

Promoters are scalping Matt's customers daily, spamming crappy stocks on dozens of boards and using IHUB to get their message out. Why shouldn't you pay a premium for access to Matt's customer base?

How much are you paid to post a silly message on IHUB boards to attract buyers? Thousands of dollars right?

I'd set the price at about $100/month minimum.
icon url

janice shell

08/26/08 6:34 PM

#116381 RE: righty #116204

If the purpose is to bring our disclosure into the open then there should be parody in the tou/tos for us like any other...

Absolutely!!