Replies to post #115523 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Mattu]

>>IMO, is not with those that disclose, it's with those that don't.

That's part of the problem, sure. The other part is those that DO disclose, but it's not abudantly clear to the common iHub user. Sure, Janice Shell can spot them from 8 miles away...but does everybody really know what a disclaimer is? Anyways, this is merely a proposed step in the process, there's obviously quite a bit to sort out.


>>I can give you a recent example of one that I suspect is a paid pumper clown, but hasn't disclosed.

See, this is what I'm NOT looking for and will be ignored should we implement this. I don't care about what you suspect. You'd need to give me specific link(s) proving compensation. Anything else will be ignored.