News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Birdito

08/12/08 10:17 AM

#55512 RE: nicehit #55511

Good points nicehit; i concur

b
icon url

Traderfan

08/12/08 10:34 AM

#55518 RE: nicehit #55511

I still disagree. If you take only 50 people each buying 15 million on average you get lots of shares.

Who should that anonymous buyer be? What is the purpose of the purchases? To give SPZI some money? Why not just giving the money directly to SPZI?
icon url

GeorgiePorgie

08/12/08 11:07 AM

#55531 RE: nicehit #55511

That's right nicehit.

Despite the reasons naysayers try force on people for not buying, millions and millions of shares are being hoovered up day after day. Who is doing that?

Let's say I wanted to take back control of my company's stock after the MM's, financiers, flippers and organized groups have had their day riding and crashing my stock. And If after all the work that has gone into my project and my pps were at these levels, I would do all I could to secretly buy my company back. I guess I wouldn't be too worried about the pps either if it were at .0001 because I could buy so much more of my company back for less money.

Now, if the market knew the company really had the so called "holy grail" and the company was really secretly buying it's own shares off the open market, what do you think would happen to the pps even without a PR if word got out? What do you think would happen to the pps with news of revenues and no more dilution needed ever.?

The direction of the pps could change here very quickly.