From another board.
By: jlecks
05 Aug 2008, 12:36 PM EDT
Msg. 748473 of 748479
(This msg. is a reply to 748457 by rosencrantz2010.)
Jump to msg. #
Because the main contributors to Obama's campaign from PAC, owners, employees, etc. of said orgaizations are:
Goldman Sachs $627,730
University of California $523,120
JPMorgan Chase & Co $398,021
Citigroup Inc $393,899
UBS AG $378,400
Google Inc $373,212
Harvard University $369,802
Lehman Brothers $353,922
National Amusements Inc $352,603
Moveon.org $347,463
Then McCain:
Merrill Lynch $284,610
Citigroup Inc $252,801
Morgan Stanley $211,821
Goldman Sachs $198,045
Blank Rome LLP $171,026
AT&T Inc $169,613
JPMorgan Chase & Co $165,275
Greenberg Traurig LLP $152,687
Credit Suisse Group $133,125
UBS AG $127,315
WALL STREET has INVESTED MUCH more money in OBAMA to buy him off. So he will represent them when he gets elected and screw American citizens, AGAIN, for pay-offs.
Sheesh, GS gave Obama over $425,000 more than McCain! JPMorgan nearly $250,000 more, and Citigroup $150,000 more!
Politicians promise all kinds of lies to get elected (look at the Clinton's and their Health-Care for Everyone scam); but once they get in office, they only take care of those who paid for them to get elected. Wall Street has donated to everyone to ensure they are PROTECTED, no matter who gets elected. Just because Obama is preaching some nonsense to secure votes, the chances of him actually following through on anything that will screw-over his main contributors is about as likely as Rosie O'Donnell being voted the Sexiest Woman of the Century.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
