Cleverrox, I do not believe diluting CTBG shares to make up the difference in shares to cover the shortfall. Nothing would be gained by doing so except further damaging CTBG's chances of survival and present shareholders. By doing a little math, it appears that GFCI had some 57.765 million shares O/S rather than 39.683 million on May 1st, 2006, thereby spreading out the 75 million CTBG shares to 1.29387 per share ratio of GFCI rather than 1.89. IMPO The overall fairest way to rectify the matter, short of forcing GFCI aka Jim Dial to come up with the additional shares of CTBG by buying them on the open market and furnishing them to the transfer agent for distribution to the short-changed shareholders, is to reduce the spinoff ratio as they are now seeking to do. Is it legal??? Who in the heck knows. I know that I am going to file a complaint with the SEC over this matter. I also am setting up to buy back the difference in the shares I sold at .06/Sh 1st thing 08/01. What the impact will be on GFCI shares over this mess, if any, is anybody's guess. GLTA to present holders of GFCI/CTBG.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
