Still have to disagree with your conclusions.
You first said that SWVC stock is worthless and will always be worthless....if so, then what's $50K of common in a worthless company? Are you trying to have it both ways?
As for the comment about TP...I'll concede that one to you and let you be the expert and leave it in your hands. But, I doubt that it's gold and I don't recall anyone showing that anyone on the inside is lining their pockets, etc. with the money that is going or not going to the VC's holding the CD's.
Would appreciate if you could display that info if and when you have it...perhaps it is in the paper trail you have been following to reach all your fact-based conclusions...or perhaps those facts are scattered along the golden road you have been walking.
Not sure what you mean when you refer to 'those that put nothing in'. From what I can see, everyone 'invested' in SWVC has put something at risk. Now, if you are speaking of those that have nothing at risk, then you are using the new math that someone else uses on this board to determine that there are 16 trillion shares needed to reduce debt. I guess in the new math, zero divided by any number cam now equal 100X....go for it.
Determine how you will invest nothing and reap a 100x return...that would make the basis for a best seller.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
