What an odd comment - that I finally "get" it.
You're still blaming the price on the RS. The price was beaten down by - well let's not go into that again - you well know what happened to the share price BEFORE the RS even took effect.
And the price action since then has nothing to do with your RS fears - and everything to do with a black-out of news.
We "enabled" them? That's pure hogwash. The share structure in place has nothing to do with their business plan, good or bad, well executed or not. We STILL await any news of substance regarding what they've been doing.
Resurrecting the old RS blame game does nothing but make you look foolish, unless you have proof that they've lined their pockets somehow as a result of it.
You have that proof?
"The writing was on the wall even back then about the Bitters way of doing business. We enabled them. If the RS had failed we would likely be at 3-4 cents pre split and would have a shareholder advocate on the board providing a proper level of transparency. Anyone who voted for the split has no grounds for complaints."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
