News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TREND1

05/07/04 8:58 PM

#241727 RE: Zeev Hed #241724

Zeev
You wrote
Larry D had a no buy signal all day yesterday on both, I don't see anyone complaining about his system.

Comment:
Yesterday was already too late to buy for swing trade.
Why?
Because Les's 10d SEMI numbers were already too high.
Above 10%

 
Semiconductors (130 stocks)
_ percent stocks over MA Trend Price Phase
_ market SOX 10 d 21 d 50 d 200d Score Phase Change
_----------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ------
_May 6 452 20 11 10 20 -99 -4.40 UP
_May 5 452 24 11 12 22 -99 -4.43
_May 4 448 13 8 10 22 -99 -4.41
_May 3 441 4 6 8 20 -99 -4.19
_Apr 30 443 2 5 8 17 -99 -3.61









icon url

Dances-W-waves

05/07/04 11:15 PM

#241766 RE: Zeev Hed #241724

You surely go outta your way to explain what I would think was obvious. Kudos! :o)
icon url

ZoZoStockWatch

05/08/04 1:09 AM

#241772 RE: Zeev Hed #241724

TALK ABOUT LONG WINDED ANSWERS...... BLAH BLAH BLAH.. JUST LISTEN TO BEARMOVE WHO POSTS HERE AND YOU'LL DO FINE ZEEV'S ANSWERS GET LONGER AND LONGER AS HE IS STILL WONDERING WHAT TO DO.... BEARMOVE TOLD YOU A MONTH AGO HE DA MAN :)


Posted by: Zeev Hed
In reply to: SteveO who wrote msg# 241578 Date:5/7/2004 8:54:00 PM
Post #of 241677

Steve, there are about three types of "traders" looking at this thread. Day traders use this thread to be aware of high volatility stocks and trade them, many others bring to the threads ideas, not just I. These people surely do not need any "hand holding", and most have done quite fine through that whole decline milking the like of NVEC, MAGS, TASR, IPIX and TIMM for all their "worth". Swing traders, well what are they swing trading? the Sox? I entered SNDK and SSTI back yesterday, and no damage donne to these entries, so I presume that if they followed, no damage there either, Larry D had a no buy signal all day yesterday on both, I don't see anyone complaining about his system. As for the bios, TEVA yielded very good trading results, and TARO was not played until it was down 30%, followers in TARO, even if they did not trade it as much as did, should be ahead of the game. BIIB, AMGN and even GENZ are essentially in the same trading range, the the "dud" NOVN was declared a dead issue immediately after earnings and exit above $20 was available to all. LSCP, LCAV, GIVN and QLTI, most should be well ahead on these and I don't see any major damage there either. As for those trading the core, I don't see how they could be damaged by my postings on the core either, the only core issue under water more than expected is IGT, I started back in at $41 ( a good $6 under the recent high)or so (and other that posted got in under that), it has not even gone down 10% from there, surely no great suffering when the like of COO, TBL, PII and POOL (for those still in these) made new highs or close to that in the last two three weeks. I don't expect any moaning at all.

As for those that use the "map" for longer term decisions, the map had a low for 3/24, a ramp and a retrace (only to the 1973 area), some just used the low for a longer term approach, and are probably still in and should be at worst, where they were about a month ago (if they followed the same map and stayed out from early January to late March, they surely are doing fine). Those that follow the details might have gone out near the first target of 2088 (we got to 2079, and I for one raised cash there to the 50% to 60% range, and posted, at worst, they got in prematurely some 80 points lower around the 1973/2000, the only miss is that from that retrench we were supposed to go and take 2088, but we did not and the last leg, so fr is a "misread". Some others may have waited for 1940 (I did not and have been mostly at the 15%/20% range EOD posture through that period, taken some losses on few issues and gains on others). Sure, I warned two weeks ago that the turnips had a very long string of good calls and that string statistically has to come to an end, it did. The question what next. I still believe that we are very close to a substantial bottom here that will see the Naz 400 to 500 points higher, so a miss of 20 of 50 points should cause anyone "major pains"? I really doubt that is the case. Well, today I finally got back in gold (many left gold when I did and should be stepping in a good 10% or more lower if they are entering here). I don't see anyone complaining to various gold bulls here for "keeping them" in gold through the last decline, everyone must use some judgment, I post mine, it is expected to have a 60% batting average, never claimed more than that. If you are right 60% of the time and use stops for those times you are not, I cannot see how this retreat is more than a little annoyance.


Zeev


icon url

wecus

05/08/04 9:50 AM

#241786 RE: Zeev Hed #241724

The three months that I now do the roadmap chart have definitely and literally shown the quality of your work IMO. Reality's landscape has matched the map's outlay much better than any sailor in unknown waters could have hoped for (and we are lesser than 16th century level in our attempt to predict the future)

Certainly there are some people on this board that look for advice they can blindly follow and I guess that the majority of those will be able to differ between the suggestions you offer through your posts and take responsability for themselves. Then there are of course those that are incapable of understanding the difficulties of investing - these could fall into much darker pits IMO so Steve's concerns might be valid but should be discarded.

I have always been afraid, though, that the sole existence of visible charting would raise the level of ankle biting and a post like landm19's capslock ranting confirms this in a way. I guess it's just imanent within the system.


icon url

Alexander

05/08/04 4:10 PM

#241844 RE: Zeev Hed #241724

Zeev

many of the stocks I scrutinize closely have gone through a long consolidation phase (some more than a year), and are (very), IMO, most likely going to start a new uptrend.

Frankly I strongly continue to believe that the large capitalized tech incumbents will continue to underperform the market.

alexandre


icon url

SteveO

05/09/04 12:49 AM

#241896 RE: Zeev Hed #241724

Either I cannot write or so many here cannot read or perhaps both. I was not complaining about your calls.