Re: "...if Corr got the company going..."
I've always appreciated your posts and thoughtfulness, but this time I believe you're arguing from a position of weakness. It was hardly Corr&Co's intention to get this company going! Corr&Co made their money selling shares rather than product in order to enrich the insiders and the private Rush Beverage Co. From 140 million to 8 billion. That's the nub of it, right there. As far as bashers go, all but one were former supporters of RSHN. As they realized, some much earlier than others, they had been conned by squirrely operatives with a 24-hour printing press, they turned negative. The scheme became glaringly obvious to them. Why others stayed in denial is the mystery, I suppose. As mentioned here on several occasions, it's a grand and familiar pitfall to invest in and hold a company based solely on liking the product while ignoring the calibre, aptitude and performance of management. The product is only 10% of the equation, management is 90% of the success or failure of any company (as witness RSHN). Fidelity Magellan's Peter Lynch often harped on that point. A worthy point and tool from the Master, to be sure.
From the purple mountains of scenic New Mexico.
These are my opinions only. Do your DD. Buying stocks is risky.
"If we could sell our experiences for what they cost us, we'd all be millionaires." -Abigail van Buren (a/k/a Dear Abby)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
