Think you are wrong on quite a few accounts here AP
In January Tom S said legacy debt was $100k from being finished & significan dilution should subside. We are 6 months down the line & although "significant dilution" did change, it's now "very significant dilution"
You state that Tom has said he would like to go to Nasdaq/Amex. Don't most penny stocks "have a dream" to sell common shareholders?
You stated look what Tom has done with this company. Well, what am I looking at? Tom hasn't done anything that wasn't put "on common shareholders" back &/or directly benefitting him/family/friends/insiders.
Tom S bought out Wisebuys (from himself & it was a very very failing business model) - Common shareholders were diluted or at least will be & all the while Tom gains shares for each one diluted
Tom S bought out Hacketts (We know Hacketts is & has been losing money) - Common shareholders were diluted or at least will be & all the while Tom gains shares for each one diluted
Tom S bought out NHSP (We do not know Assets/Liabilities/Revenue from this, just that "Tom Says" the revenue is approximately this $$$ amount) - Common shareholders were diluted or at least will be & all the while Tom gains shares for each one diluted
Tom S signed 8 new CD's even before paying off the 2 legacy debt CDs - 8 new ones after all the losses common shareholders had during the initial ones. - - Common shareholders were diluted or at least will be & all the while Tom gains shares for each one diluted
What has Tom done for the benefit of retail common shareholders? NOTHING!!!!!! Buying losing businesses from himself & friends? Taking over shells to get another company out of debt to make himself/kk very rich? I do not think any of these items are anything that any CEO with a real honest fudiciary approach would take, especially when you consider that common shareholders are down approximately $25 million + & the only thing we have to show for it is 5% ownership of $1 million in assets!