News Focus
News Focus
icon url

omehay

05/29/08 12:02 PM

#23634 RE: venomen2002 #23632

i second that! ONEV is going to have a huge future. How do I know I have been reading the pr speaking to the company and all is in alignment. For all those investors who are thinking about buying ONEV now is the time before the price moves up.
icon url

boehmer

05/29/08 12:08 PM

#23637 RE: venomen2002 #23632

Veno,

I understand you tiring of the constant gloom & doom downer talk by some, but there are valid concerns/questions made by some people here that may not exactly be cheerleaders. I think this board is much more useful and thought provoking the way it is, than it would be if all dissenting views were quashed and we all talked about happy positive info all the time. Besides, there wouldn't be a lot to talk about lately.
icon url

Santa Barbara Broker

05/29/08 7:17 PM

#23725 RE: venomen2002 #23632

Simple question. What if Rob K and ONEV are lying to or misleading shareholders? What if they have been lying to or misleading shareholders all along? There is more than ample evidence in One Voice SEC filings which have been verified and signed off on by Dean Weber for over eight years that more than once shareholders have at least been misled. It is difficult to make an ironclad case that it has been intentional, but eight years is a long time to be making excuse after excuse to "wait" just a bit longer for every single deal you have ever signed to produce significant revenue. Now they are claiming that Telmex contract "should" prompt a material event. I am certain that "event" will either never happen or be "delayed" into oblivion, but I am waiting to be fascinated by the excuse as to why. A song and dance session I am sure will be worth the price of admission alone.

So the choice here is to seek information from ONLY those people who have been proven by their own SEC filings to be wrong far more often than not, or to be silent? ONEV has become religion? Believe else ye burn heretic? That is the purpose of the ONEV board? Sounds a lot like "If I say my hearsay is a fact, it is a fact. That's all the evidence you need."

"We" all know what happens 99% of the time when that familiar rhetoric gets shoveled out of ONEV's one trick pony stall.