News Focus
News Focus
icon url

janice shell

04/26/08 9:10 PM

#328627 RE: rollingrock #328624

the invasion of those countries to me an invasion would be to take over the country. but that's not what we did.

Sure we did. We disbanded their army (in retrospect not a very bright idea) and destroyed their economy. Then we installed a "government" we favored.

Classic invasion and occupation.
icon url

Rover_az

04/26/08 11:59 PM

#328691 RE: rollingrock #328624

lol.

you must be a redneck
icon url

seabass

04/27/08 3:14 AM

#328722 RE: rollingrock #328624

>>>an invasion would be to take over the country. but that's not what we did.<<<


I've wondered about you for a while but no more.

Between 600,000 and 1 million civilians have been killed, 2.5 million have fled the country since the war started and 75 major american bases have been established around the country, staffed with 150,000 US troops and US contractors. But it's not an invasion?

Not even the retarded commander guy is dumb enough to get into that discussion.

"The United States was right to invade Iraq, but choices made after the initial invasion have eroded security in the country, President Bush said in a television interview to be broadcast today."

http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2007/01/14/bush_says_choices_made_after_invasion_eroded_iraqs_security/


Are you really this stupid or is this the price you pay for being loyal to George Bush? I know there's about 25% of em' out there.