News Focus
News Focus
icon url

paid pumper

04/09/08 3:33 PM

#19896 RE: Chadman #19895

I tink his "resignation" was reactionary, thinking the share price would rise if it was known that Clayton was no longer with the company. He and his minions still have all the shares and control everything. Kind of reminds me of Clayton's NOBO tactic which also failed to move the share price up.
icon url

Cutting Corners

04/09/08 3:40 PM

#19898 RE: Chadman #19895

Can we assume by your post that you now believe, with certainty, everything that Drake says? You should read their website end to end then, you and your buddies will be buying Drake stock like there's no tomorrow. I'll be waiting for a run in the PPS forthwith.

Bob
icon url

Cutting Corners

04/09/08 8:42 PM

#19907 RE: Chadman #19895

You're drawing a conclusion from a statement made by Drake? So, does that mean you believe some of what they say? All? None? Why use the quote?


"Maybe so...however I'd consider a resignation from the business, and the following statement to lead one to believe he will not be a major contributor, nor anything approaching a day to day contributor."

"Though he is stepping down from his official role with Drake, he will remain available to the board if needed for his expertise on an advisory basis, regardless of any future endeavor. "


Your conclusion is, based on the quote, that "..he will not be a major contributor, nor anything approaching a day to day contributor."

Therefore, you believe the quote to be true and use it as a basis for your opinion.