News Focus
News Focus
icon url

mlsoft

04/09/08 12:53 AM

#325315 RE: webster groves #325296

webster...

Partially right. Abraham did listen to Sarah and cast Ishmael out, but only because God specifically told him to do so. God promised Abraham that He would protect and bless Ismael and make him the father of a great nation (the arabs), but that the original Abrahamic Covenant promise of a land, a seed, and the other covenant blessings would come only through the line of Isaac, through Jacob (Israel).

God did not have to rescue Ishmael because of circumstances, but because of His promises to Abraham -- God never has to do anything but to be true to His own perfect nature.

Scripture leaves no question that the covenant promises of God to Abraham are passed down through Isaac and Jacob. Ismael was never in that picture, but God, in an act of grace to Abraham, promised to make Ismael a great nation also. Scripture also prophesied that there would always be enmity between the descendents of Ismael and the descendents of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob.

mlsoft
icon url

mlsoft

04/09/08 1:05 AM

#325318 RE: webster groves #325296

webster...

I may be completely wrong about this, but off the top of my head I cannot think of such a law in Scripture (eating milk and meat at the same time) and am inclined to think it is a case of where man's law has been added to God's law despite the prohibition against doing so. I will have to do some research on that when I have more time. The closest thing I can think of in the Law is that they were not to boil the meat of the lamb in the mother's milk.

mlsoft