News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jackknife

04/05/08 7:50 PM

#103943 RE: The Tooth Fairy #103942

What are you trying to say,that a swindler could never be swindled? I'm sure you've heard the saying "what comes around goes around".
icon url

stratocasterca

04/05/08 7:51 PM

#103945 RE: The Tooth Fairy #103942

please explain how you come to the conclusion that pedro is a victim in this fiasco.

He has the money, he has the certs that were signed over, and the cash from the PDR's that were sold out of the texas office.

He removed MT from PNMS and installed himself as the man in charge.

He has traveled extensively on our nickel, and has yet to show a single independently verifiable accomplishment.

He communicates through the fluidity of blogs and surrogates on this board, maintaining deniability and the ability to change his communique's at the drop of a hat, which has dropped several times.

He sure doesn't spend much on web design and computer systems, as nothing he has tried has ever worked so far.

So tell us again why he is a victim? Because some people point out his baloney on a message board and it hurts his feelings?
If he is such a tough combat veteran, you would think his skin would be thicker than whining about some cartoon characters harassing him. Booo Hoooo for him.



icon url

PepsiMan

04/05/08 8:03 PM

#103947 RE: The Tooth Fairy #103942

That is what I am finding when I google it as well. Looks like Pedro is the victim alright.
icon url

stratocasterca

04/05/08 9:09 PM

#103950 RE: The Tooth Fairy #103942

mr. fairy, even though you posted a link from a week ago that was about a court case involving pedro in central america, it still has no bearing on his behavior as the leader of PNMS.

Anyone can claim they have been swindled, and file as a plaintiff. For all we know, it is he who swindled someone and then claimed he was swindled. But that is only speculation, and has no bearing on his conduct as the PNMS jefe.

to follow your logic, if a person got a traffic ticket, then he would not be guilty of stealing at work.
two totally unrelated things are being discussed, yet you are trying to tie the two together to try to show that pedro has not screwed over the shareholders of PNMS to biblical proportions because he is suing someone else about another matter.

You can do better than that. Such as explaining where the hundreds of millions of dollars they supposedly have came from, and where the money went after people sold PDR's and the money got absconded with. thats right, stolen. they cannot produce evidence of where it is, and are not paying what they owe, and now they say "oh, we said we could keep the money, you didn't read the fine print" or some such baloney.

The fact that you are trying to defend such a pack of lies does not reflect well on your character. Most people that defended them a long ways finally saw the reality and left in a dignified way, such as 4god, etc. Some of us caught on early and serve as a beacon to keep newbies off the shoals.