News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tchalla

04/04/08 11:09 AM

#74148 RE: tchalla #74147

in fact, that is the part that the sec should look at in my opinion. the pr of the contract for $80mil, followed by the incessant news and the emails from ir admitting the mad dilution and then the silence from the company with no proof of the $80mil contract. i mean, this is how it is looking right now.
icon url

xray44b9

04/04/08 11:12 AM

#74154 RE: tchalla #74147

I think there's simply nowhere left for IR to go here as whatever modus operandi was in-play has worked, is over and they have the money and here we sit. The best thing is for this to completely fall of the trader radars and if it's a real company, good things will happen.
icon url

eye_ater

04/04/08 11:18 AM

#74163 RE: tchalla #74147

You're nuts. They did release info in that time frame just not what you wanted to hear. Period. SEC would through you out the door for wasting there time with this crap.