News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Bearmove

04/09/04 7:30 PM

#228959 RE: Bearmove #228956

Here is some info on it...

Los Angeles Times
Apr 08, 2004
by Elizabeth Douglass, Times Staff Writer

FTC Will Review Shell Oil's Plan to Close Refinery;


Some antitrust experts wonder whether the Bakersfield plant is in the agency's jurisdiction.
The Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday that it was evaluating whether Shell Oil Co.'s plan to close its Bakersfield refinery raised antitrust or unfair competition concerns, but the agency stopped short of launching a formal investigation.

The commission said it would conduct the review in a letter to Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who had asked the FTC to investigate the planned closure, arguing that it would limit competition and raise gasoline prices for West Coast consumers.

"The issues that you have raised are very important to this agency and will be seriously considered as the agency evaluates the situation with respect to the Bakersfield refinery and determines what course of action, if any, may be warranted," FTC Chairman Timothy J. Muris said in a letter to Wyden on Tuesday that was made public Wednesday.

Wyden, whose state gets a third of its gasoline from California refineries, said he wasn't satisfied.

"When someone says they are 'seriously considering' something, that's Washington code for nothing's going to happen," he said. At the FTC, Wyden added, "They can find every possible rationale for not doing anything for the consumer."

Chuck Samel, an antitrust attorney with Howrey Simon Arnold & White in Los Angeles, said that "when the FTC says they'll look seriously at an issue, they do." But Samel and other experts questioned whether the agency had the authority to intervene in the Shell case.

"Under the existing antitrust laws, this unilateral decision to shut the plant down wouldn't rise to the level of an antitrust violation, even if there were legitimate concerns about the effects on the market," said antitrust attorney Charles Biggio, a former Justice Department official and a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in Washington.

Wyden disagreed, saying the FTC did indeed have jurisdiction because Shell had gained full ownership of the Bakersfield refinery through a divesture required by the commission when it approved the Chevron-Texaco merger in 2001.

An FTC representative didn't return a call for comment Wednesday. A Shell spokesman said the company wouldn't comment because executives hadn't reviewed the FTC letter.

Shell said late last year that it would shutter the refinery in Bakersfield on Oct. 1 because the facility's crude oil supply, which is pumped from nearby oil fields, was on the decline.

State officials and consumer groups say that with gasoline supplies so tight, loss of any refining capacity could push pump prices up. If the Bakersfield facility closes, California's gasoline production would fall by 2%, and its diesel output by 6%, small numbers that loom large in a market suffering from chronic fuel shortages. A variety of refinery outages this year marked the start of a prolonged climb in gasoline prices that has kept the statewide average above $2 a gallon for seven weeks.

"Given the current shortage, or apparent shortage in refinery capacity, it's critical that that refinery stay open," said Michael Shames, executive director of the Utility Consumers Action Network, based in San Diego. California Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer is investigating Shell's plan; he could act under state antitrust and unfair competition laws. Jamie Court, president of Santa
Monica-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, recently urged the attorney general to redouble his efforts on the case, citing Shell documents that show the Bakersfield refinery is profitable and running with higher profit margins than any of the company's other U.S. refineries.

Court and others accuse the company of wanting to eliminate the Bakersfield facility to strain California's fuel supplies to boost profit at Shell refineries in Los Angeles and in the Bay Area city of Martinez.

Shell spokesman Cameron Smyth has called such allegations "absolutely false."
=============================================

November 14, 2003

Shell closing Bakersfield refinery

Alan Doyle

Shell Oil Products U.S. said Thursday it is closing its 70,000 barrel-per-day Bakersfield refinery because of dwindling crude supplies. The facility will begin receiving finished-product shipments from other Shell refineries, including the company's Martinez refinery.


The 71-year-old Bakersfield refinery will close by Oct. 1, 2004, said Aamir Farid, general manager of Shell Products' Bay Valley Complex, which includes Bakersfield and the 165,000 bpd Martinez refinery, where Farid is based. The Bakersfield terminal will be adapted to receive finished-product shipments from Martinez and Shell's other U.S. refineries in Wilmington and Anacortes, Wash., Farid said.

As part of the closure, Shell will take a $200 million charge in the fourth quarter. The refinery's 245 employees will be offered jobs at other Shell facilities or severance packages, Farid said. Shell Oil Products U.S. is a subsidiary of global giant Royal Dutch Shell Group of Cos.

Bakersfield is the third refinery to close since 1995 because of declining supplies of San Joaquin Valley Heavy Crude in the Kern River field. The Golden Bear refinery in Oildale closed in 2001 and Sunland Oil shut its Bakersfield refinery in 1995.

The Kern River field, which has been producing since 1899, is California's third-largest, accounting for about 15 percent of the crude produced in the state. The field has an estimated 20 to 25-year supply remaining, according to the major operator, San Ramon-based ChevronTexaco Corp.

"We concluded there is simple not enough crude supply to ensure the viability of the refinery in the long term," Farid said.

The refinery, California's 12th largest, opened in 1932 and went through four owners before Shell acquired it. Texaco Inc. bought the refinery in 1984. Bakersfield and Martinez were operated from 1998 to 2001 as part of Equilon Enterprises LLC, the joint venture between Shell and Texaco to handle U.S. refining and marketing. Shell acquired full ownership of the refinery in 2001 when Texaco was required to sell its Equilon holdings as a condition of the merger that created ChevronTexaco Corp.

Texaco and Chevron Corp. merged to create the nation's second-largest and world's fifth-largest oil company, San Ramon-based ChevronTexaco. ChevronTexaco is the largest producer in the Kern River field, using steam injection wells to extract 100,000 barrels day. Still, the field's production is declining, according to state statistics, from 48.7 million barrels in 1998 to an estimated 38.8 million barrels in 2002.

The Bakersfield closing is the second cutback this year in Shell's Bay Valley Complex as Royal Dutch/Shell assesses its global operations. In February, Farid said Shell was closing the 4,500 bpd napthenic base oils unit, which employed 96 workers, by Sept. 1 because of poor market conditions.


icon url

plexxus

04/09/04 10:31 PM

#228965 RE: Bearmove #228956

Bear..."rolling bubbles" lol I like that phrase and agree like schools of fish the bubbles will inflate/deflate from various sectors. The internet bubble is already starting to inhale helium once again. I also agree with your bigger picture take. I think we're going to break to new highs fairly soon given the abundance of bullish looking inverse h/s patterns.
icon url

GAB

04/09/04 11:12 PM

#228968 RE: Bearmove #228956

Bear.......Any opinion on RAND. A tiny TINY? TIA