spree -- more than a few people are saying that, or expressing such suspicions, about 9/11 -- myself, I don't know what the real story of 9/11 is (and I've never said otherwise), but it's clear to me that dismissing any such possibility out of hand is not warranted on the factual evidence that is available so far -- how do you explain the voluminous facts suggesting the possibility of just some such scenario that have been compiled and presented in painstaking detail at the Center for Cooperative Research site? -- how do you prove your smug postulate that 9/11 was just a screw-up, and couldn't possibly at least have been generally expected (if not specifically known) ahead of time and deliberately not prevented by some in this country who were/are in, or involved in directing, our current administration? -- you cannot deny that 9/11 has been awfully convenient to the agenda of the neo-cons . . .
and in any event, the real reason I posted that essay was for the part I bolded; I included the whole thing simply to be fair, so others here could see the essay in its entirety -- and you have yet to reply at all to that bolded part, which I have said and hereby say again I think is dead solid on the money -- what is your substantive response to and analysis of that bolded part of the essay?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
