Legal theory? Can anybody explain what Nokia is talking about? I translate this as, "We've paid you enough already, so we can keep using your technology (including new) without you agreeing because we have a continuing contract". Maybe the reporter oversimplified.
This type of shrill outburst from Nokia leads me to believe the lawyers gave the owners the bad news and the owners are insisting they tell the court about the billion dollars they already paid and that they are paid up to date. We know that last part is untrue and easily shown.I dont think competent lawyers would make that arguement unless forxced to by their employers. My guess is the results are coming in sooner rather than later. Its going to be good which is why Q did a buy back and raised dividends. Your guess is as good as mine as to how soon is soon? But I think within three months we should know the results. Glad you came back in time, Biz.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
