Perhaps my comments were not taken the way I intended. Best, I certainly appreciate you taking on the thankless task of moderating this board and I didn't mean to criticize you. So let me say thanks to you and the others helping to moderate things here (see it's no longer a 'thankless' task. 8^)).
As I said, I didn't see the deleted posts but it seemed curious to me that choad's posts were being deleted. He's become more negative than most but from everything I've seen him post there doesn't seem to be an agenda other than asking hard questions (perhaps in a snarky way, but hey, to each his own). And I think, as I have said many times, that it's rational and most appropriate to take a hard look at the things we're being told when the stock price seems so dissonant from the seeming progress being made at the company. Something doesn't jibe. When the juniors had a bounce recently we got zilch. Why is that?
In answer to your question about accurately defining 'reasonable criticism', I think it's any question or concern which is not obsessively repeated, which seems genuinely asked and which hasn't already been addressed (to that same person). How's that for nebulous? lol. I don't know, man. I just worry that we're all a bit too much like the proverbial donkey chasing a carrot on the end of a stick.
Market Data 
Markets 
