News Focus
News Focus
icon url

CombJelly

03/28/04 11:57 PM

#30008 RE: KeithDust2000 #30006

"However, AMD already gave 102mm^2 for that one at the latest presentation !?! "

I missed that. Ok, of course, that means my estimates were off. Apologies all around.

It's hard to estimate exactly the die size a process shrink will yield with public data. I guess I was over-optimistic...
icon url

jhalada

03/29/04 1:50 PM

#30047 RE: KeithDust2000 #30006

Keith,

512kb L2 cache part @ 90nm (Winchester). However, AMD already gave 102mm^2 for that one at the latest presentation !?!

So is the official word 102 mm^2 for 512K and 114 mm^2 for 1 MB version? The difference seems a little low.

Joe