News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Stratey

02/22/08 1:18 PM

#98225 RE: 67dart #98222

Also IR said they took the critics posts most seriously and asked how long that has been going on? They were clueless that the critics were so powerfull! That CC should resolve matters once and for all

SO, you're saying that the IR was unaware that there were critics on the IHUB site????????

Dart, IR and town hall (which has been deleted) has blamed critics for the low PPS for a very long time. I'm sure many here will back this up.

I hate to break it to you, but the IR isn't being 100 honest with you, if that's what you heard.

Oh, and the disgruntled ex-franchisee excuse is just peachy.

I always say, when you're pointing a finger at someone, there's always four pointing right back at yourself. You might want to share that with the IR
icon url

ergo sum

02/22/08 2:31 PM

#98250 RE: 67dart #98222

lmao
icon url

ratso1

02/22/08 2:50 PM

#98251 RE: 67dart #98222

I think your idea and the reasons for it are a supreme embarrassment to the company.

Would GM, or Apple, or Google, or any legitimate company have a conference call just for board mods from the various chat boards because they are "so powerful"?

Here's a novel idea for MONA management--get started by DOING IT THE RIGHT WAY!

Disseminate information the way the big boys do. If you call a conference call, it should be done for the ENTIRE INVESTING UNIVERSE. PERIOD.

There should be no qualification for access to a formal informational meeting limited to 6 or 7 people based on the arbitrary "qualification" of being a board mod on what is, in the real world, a very OBSCURE chat board! This is a huge turnoff for investors that know up from down.

Serious companies don't behave this way. But then again, they don't conduct blogs, they don't communicate via leaky emails and through company proxies on chat boards. They do it the correct way--through official filings and PR's through the major newswires.
icon url

PRAE

02/22/08 3:10 PM

#98255 RE: 67dart #98222

If what you say is true...

then MONA management is far more novice and talentless than I feared.

A couple of thoughts:

1) Little anecdote - My biz partner & I recently contemplated purchasing a privately held company larger than MONA, more profitable than MONA with better prospects than MONA. Price tag was $500k and we thought it was a bit high but not out of line. That tells me MONA's pps is worth about .005 or less. Take from that what you will.

2) Imo, those who have buy orders in for MONA are doing all of us a disservice. That's right. The divy pay date is being postponed (imo) in order for MONA to sell into those buyers. They know shareholders are holding for the divy and once the divy hits the pps will collapse. So they're in no rush to announce a pay date. Placing a buy order is simply enabling them to achieve their goal and delay the divy in the process.