Replies to post #850 on Hall of Fame Beverages, Inc (HFBG)

[makesumgravy]

Never said this.......This company files and look at the share count.........practically all these companies doing business has debt. The smaller the debt is always better of course, but taking on some debt is not bad either, its part of doing business. Most bars operate on credit and pay according to their arrangements. Burying a company in dilution hurts them more than anything else. There is nothing wrong with selling some shares if its within reason and not so aggressively it takes the stock to very low levels. What you have to understand, the cheaper a stock gets does not mean its less expensive. You have to bang this up against the o/s count and revenues to see if the end justifies the means. A stock trading at .0002 looks cheap, but the more shares you have to purchase to do any real good can be associated with a very high level of risk, and as it goes most pinks are.

[makesumgravy]

You seemed to compare HOF to BVRG, and that was plain ridiculous. We are nothing like them either.

Here I disagree there are companies competing to have their new drinks recognized and taken to market.

I believe that Hall of Famers probably will beat them in taste test, hands down. The tea in particular. But this should be their goals, not dumping all these shares into the market.

This would be to say pepsi and coke are so different with the way they have their business structured. They have completely different taste, but their business models are similar. They are the titans fighting for market share.

These companies are similar and they were trading at .002 a year ago. If this is a fair comparison we have to look at the sharecount.

[FUC1UC2]

low volume is a sign that the quasi-hedgies contracted the flu

or people are indecisive