News Focus
News Focus
icon url

xZx

02/15/08 12:22 AM

#51482 RE: Argyll #51478

the focus of our disagreement was volume. by your logic argyll a bad situation never improves and any light we see at the end of the tunnel is an oncoming train. trust me, you don't have to point out the price drop. suggesting something so basic is just insulting to me and many others on this board.

why did i suggest you qualify your statements as your opinion? i'm calling you on an unrelenting negative bias that is coming into play at what could easily be the bottom of the chart. that's the last place i want to see shareholders coerced into hitting the sell button. especially when boardmarks are at an all-time high and so many eyes are looking for that reversal.

according to your post, you sold and are on the sidelines. maybe the ethical thing would be to stop fomenting a sense of never-ending doom. fair enough?


icon url

tombrady12nh

02/15/08 7:56 AM

#51490 RE: Argyll #51478

This is just my opinion, but I would not be surprised if certain companies that initiated coverage on this stock were perhaps not doing so for the right reasons-only for personal gain, shorting, etc. perhaps doing it for the ex-executives of this company. I DON'T TRUST ANYONE, if this goes sub penny my only investments will be mutual funds. JMHO