News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jessellivermore

02/08/08 4:14 PM

#7875 RE: St_armands_man #7874

I'm with Dew on this one all the way Newberry's answer doesnt really ring true
icon url

pollyvonwog

02/08/08 4:15 PM

#7876 RE: St_armands_man #7874

No one commented earlier, but could there even be a remote possibility that HD revenues are significantly higher than expected thus further augmenting their negotiating position?
icon url

croumagnon

02/08/08 4:19 PM

#7878 RE: St_armands_man #7874

Thank you St_armands_man for keeping the hope alive for us by reporting your conversations with Tom Neuburry, and also providing your insightful interpretation of these conversations...

One thing that I always wondered about when it came to posters relating their conversations with management of a company. By doing so, you will be compromising your screen name as it will be obvious to some (Newburry in this case at least) who you really are as a person as opposed to having an anonymous screen name. Does that not bother you?

icon url

wjlknew

02/08/08 4:54 PM

#7891 RE: St_armands_man #7874

>Newberry made the statement to me that they didn't want to let a potential partner feel that it was to their advantage to delay any deals. If a potential partner felt that the delay would drive GTCB's cash position into one of desperation, they'd delay as long as possible hoping to put themselves into a better negotiating position.<

If Newberry is being candid, which I doubt, they accomplished their purpose. I am sure a potential partner no longer FEELS it is to their advantage to delay any deal. Now a potential partner KNOWS it is to their advantage. If GTCB had easily pulled in a $30 million line of credit, that strategy might have worked. Instead GTCB could only raise a relatively small amount by giving away the farm ... again. Any potential partner worth having will just wait this one out.

icon url

biopearl

02/08/08 5:50 PM

#7897 RE: St_armands_man #7874

St. A--If so why not just get a loan? We've got the collateral in IP, land, future milestones, potential partners etc.??? This is a serious question that maybe you can address as a CFO. Would not a loan be better for the existing stockholders? Why not allow the existing stockholders the opportunty to obtain warrents too while they are at it...Regards and hope to all, bp