It's difficult to argue about realistic "ranges" without being more specific about what your "range" means. One standard deviation? Over what domain of applications?
Well that's the rub now isn't it. The 64 bit applications that appear will be a self-selecting sample space. As BUGGI correctly points out why would an ISV bother with expense of an AMD64 distribution of a program unless it provides a performance benefit beyond the basic noise level of benchmarking.
Pointing to N released AMD64 programs and claiming their average, range, or variance of performance increase over 32 bit equivalents as typical of 64 bit compilation will be fallacious. The programs that are losers or just break even with 64 bits will not be represented in anywhere close to realistic proportions.