"oh at least I can say that there is MUCH past history of a turn in between the 100 and 200. "
Well that's good to hear...and yeah, I see some of that. I've liked this 1955-1965 area as a downside target, but didn't necessarily think we needed it yet, maybe that's my mistake. After looking at a few things here, I can see I should have expected it. I had another spot, near that 1991 area (and the 100 day), that I've been thinking we could bounce from to marginal new highs, then come back to a slightly new low at that 1965...basically just get it later, maybe months. But it really looks like I should have expected it now. Even from the '93 thing, it looks like this should have happened, I'm just paying too much attention to the 100 day I think. Anyway, I still think we get a good bounce right here...let's just see how (or if) it develops.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
