News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ljk

03/03/04 4:40 AM

#32573 RE: Mattu #32572

My apologies for the two posts yesterday morning. This is what was wrong about what I did:

1. For an undetermined reason I got some very old messages on my screen early in the morning, messages that I thought were current, and responded to them thinking they had just been posted. By the time I realized that part of my mistake, I wanted to exchange the text on my two posts to “delete this” but the editing window had closed in both cases.

2. I wanted to delete them in part because their content was inappropriate at any time not only because I realized the temporal mistake and that his posts were not current.

3. I thought you and I would have a dialog about it later and that I’d be able to explain it and apologize later, but you put me in jail without a dialog, which I didn’t expect, because of the history of this matter which includes serious repeated acts of criminal harassment against me, and which did not lead to the other person losing the free "paid" account you gave him, did not lead to the removal of numerous bizarre posts including the header of his supposed trading board, did not lead to his being jailed.

4. Additionally, I expected some leeway because one of the boards in which I posted one of the notes is one where a lot of leeway is provided in general, with your approval – numerous offensive posts, reported to you, on that board, were never removed, nor were the offenders jailed.

While I do not justify having made the posts, the above is why I expected the consideration of communication prior to action, and why I didn’t immediately PM you to head off problems when I realized my error. Of course, all these matters are entirely your calls and I really should have notified you right away.

I do not justify the text of the posts I made,. I almost immediately regretted them. They were inappropriate to iHub. I’d have myself removed them if the edit window had been a little longer, and have no disagreement with your removing those posts.

I can promise not to post in that manner again, and of course will comply with whatever sentence you determine. If there’s any other problem, please let me know.

Linda

icon url

Burpzilla

03/03/04 5:44 AM

#32576 RE: Mattu #32572

Matt, I don't think you should allow this lie to stand. (Is that a paradox, a lie that stands? Hmm..)

"For an undetermined reason I got some very old messages on my screen early in the morning, messages that I thought were current, and responded to them thinking they had just been posted."


Essentially, she's trying to blame her premeditated action on a "glitch" in iHub. Like it's your fault.

Lame!





icon url

gd2aussie3.old

03/03/04 1:38 PM

#32582 RE: Mattu #32572

IH Admin[Matt}...Well, it didn't take long to get back in here; but,for the life of me, you've really got me guessing on this one. Was it because i posted on 2/27???

I've only got two posts on the board and neither one from what I can see violated any TOS.

1)Posted by: gd2aussie3
In reply to: Jagman who wrote msg# 1556
Date:2/27/2004 12:40:14 PM
Post #of 1592
Jag...Did you really mean MEM or FASC? LOL.
Here's hoping you have a g'day.

2)Posted by: gd2aussie3
In reply to: beischens who wrote msg# 1548
Date:2/27/2004 12:54:53 PM
Post #of 1592
beischens..That was a good find. What surprised me was
that no one on this fineee board saw fit to share it
with posters on RB that have a true interest in FASC and
don't access this board. After all, it's rare that you
find fASC mentioned any where. One of my complaints
about fASC that I've voiced to management, they don't
appear in any of the trade journals. Thanks for the
effort.

Here's hoping you have a g'day.

None of my posts have been deleted, please give a little help on this one.

Thanks.