News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jarvis c

02/24/04 10:54 PM

#4005 RE: jarvis c #4004

skunks- despite your support for kerry, i consider you a voice of reason on this board. what do you make of all the allegations swirling on RB that this is pump and dump?
if so frank should be prosecuted. the problem is we all expect someone else is going to take care of it.
curious to me is how many of the QBID enthusiasts on RB during the past three weeks have disappeared. something seems wrong.
icon url

jmhollen

02/24/04 10:56 PM

#4006 RE: jarvis c #4004

Because TWC is a reasonably reputable major corporation.
A) They don't give a rat's tush if QBID makes it or not - at the HQ level.
B) Their subsidiaries need to carry this ball.
C) If the subs can make profit from QBID's signal, the HQ will take notice.
D) TWC is going to put absolutely "0" of its credibility or rep behind F.O.
E) Every step of the journey is going to have to be PROFESSIONALLY earned - the media biz is a (w)itch.

Keep in mind, TWC could buy F.O. out (..and he can sell you out with his SuperVoting Shares..) in a flash. If this deal starts to roll, nobody in their right mind would leave F.O. in charge. He's a buffoon, with the reputation of a venemous snake. Do your DD on the lawsuits.

John :-)
icon url

chisox pat

02/24/04 11:00 PM

#4007 RE: jarvis c #4004

TW wil not mention the contract unless/until they decide to execute it. They will only do that if there is enough interest to make it financially viable for them. It appears that TTN is on it's own as far as lining up sponsors and markets requesting the service. If that is the case, TW will carry the signal for them. Not impossible, but there is still a long way to go.
icon url

skunksyard

02/25/04 8:13 AM

#4011 RE: jarvis c #4004

jarvis c...when I spoke to TWC they said they don't PR this type of activity...so it's company policy