News Focus
News Focus
icon url

samaelrocks

10/31/07 11:12 AM

#153812 RE: DownWithPumpers #153811

Thanks for the info. I copied it over on HSM where several questions were asked. Of course, you have the credit for the DD.
icon url

sc4good

10/31/07 11:36 AM

#153814 RE: DownWithPumpers #153811

Your statement about defaults sounds good. Maybe someone will think it applys here. LOL.
icon url

mastaflash

10/31/07 11:53 AM

#153816 RE: DownWithPumpers #153811

"If proof of damages or other relief is necessary, a hearing will be held in which the judge determines terms of the default judgment." - My point exactly. Where's the beef?
icon url

mastaflash

10/31/07 12:00 PM

#153819 RE: DownWithPumpers #153811

RPH has already presented evidence showing he has not received ill gotten gains. SEC has present nada. Why? Because they don't have anything. Your hallucinating if you think the judge is going to award damages without conclusive evidence of wrong doing. The only hope for SEC, is to provide trading records proving their case. Problem is, those trading records will point in a different direction and absolve RPH. I have no doubt of this now.

Now the real question is, why are you obsessed with a down and out CEO of a defunct company? Things that make one go hmmmmm.....