Replies to post #1821 on NMC Inc. (fka NMCX)

[albacora]

No mining experts are required. The jury found the following:

The key wording here includes ALL assets, silver valley, san bernadino, skull valley, EVERY as in ALL. Get it yet?

Case 1:03-cv-01507 Document 269 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10
essentially contrary to the conclusions of the jury verdict in this case, and should be disregarded.
The jury’s responses to the verdict interrogatories indicated that it found fraud, against both defendants, on every category of assets that HCCA recorded on its balance sheet between 1996 and 2001. Further, the jury found fraud in virtually all press releases that the defendants caused HCCA to issue between 1996 and 2001. This scheme was a “pump and dump” whereby the defendants issued false “good news” press releases to pump the stock price, which they then often followed with large sales of their personal HCCA stock. It was Furlong and Pietrzak who consistently benefited from the fraud, at the expense of other shareholders. It is abundantly clear from Furlong’s and Pietrzak’s trial testimony that they lived essentially, over the 3½ year period of the fraud, from their personal stock sales in HCCA. During the fraud, they were dumping stock on an unsuspecting public based upon information that they released in the marketplace, which they knew to be false. From the jury’s verdict (including its responses to the verdict interrogatories), no other reasonable conclusion can be reached. To that end, there are no real mitigating “factors” that this Court should consider in imposing final judgment against the defendants.

[gary_17368]

My response was in reference to"AN's" "...I will do a thorough review of the company this weekend including current and past information and will try to provide an unbiased history so that new investors can make up their own minds."

Where are all of these "experts" (spelled 'AN') coming from; that's my point... My OR your statement should be as accurate and unbiased as AN or anyone elses.

The majority of these 'experts' will come back in a few days with a "yeah; this stocks hot; buy; buy; buy!!!" The newbie buys and the stock tanks. Oh, and the 'expert' sells on the spike; need I say more? I'm not the sharpest tack in the pack but I'm not a dummy either!

I still own a bunch of this stock and will hang on to it; root, hog or die... If it comes through so be it...; if not, same again. I'm retired and don't need this stock to subsidize my retirement income. Someone 'may' get a few bucks from this investment after I'm gone IF this stock ever moves up so don't get your jock strap in a knot, ok?

I'm here for the duration and will continue to post my opines as the so-called "experts" do. My only motive is to try keeping the newbie forewarned to do their own due diligence on this OR any penny stock they have a hankering to drop a few bucks on. It's gotta be money (spelled disposable income...) that they can afford to lose because in 99% of the times it will be a donation and all you will be rewarded with is another end of year tax loss writeoff.