Sally, I'm not sure if you're being serious or joking. Anyway, all one has to do is browse around for other cases... and then you'll have your answer. I've seen some pretty harsh outcomes for which the official ruling took a LONG time. It is faulty to assume that this type of timeframe (less than a year) has anything to do with innocence (or guilt).
Forensic accounting is a long and tedious process. Government agencies also have strict guidelines and processes they have to follow it does not make for fast rulings. Have you not ever heard "The wheels of justice grind slowly" its a very common and true saying.
Your question has already been answered more than once today. Stop obfuscating, Sally.
Regulatory agencies move slowly and deliberately. The only time any gov't agency *might* react quickly is if there is an imminent physical threat to citizens. Otherwise, sit down, take your shoes off, kick back and get ready to wait.
I would take any slowness of action on the OSC's part as a BAD sign for SLJB. It may well mean there is so much evidence against them that the process of evaluating it all is taking longer than average.