Replies to post #286185 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[boogaloo]

Your assumptions about guilt or innocence being reflected in the expediency (or lack of) in a legal ruling are erroneous.

[Disinterested One]

Sally, take a look at the OSC website. Look at the average length of time from beginning of investigation to resolution. It's often measured in years. Sure, some cases are resolved quickly, but most involve several continuations (or delays, as you seem to prefer).

Please don't make statements such as your last post that imply the OSC is lacking evidence against SLJB just because they didn't react instantaneously.

IMO.

[EarnestDD]

Most of the Canadian shareholders on these boards would love to sell ... but can't.
imo

[cfoofme]

Yep sally, you are so right. The SEC does appreciate tips from the public. FYI, they do not receive a tip and act on it the next day,month, or year in most cases. Also FYI, you might be interested in this little SEC action among many others.

How long have you been "investing" in pinkies?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=18652343

[janniebgood]

Sally, the securities regulators actually value the input of disgruntled shareholders of scammy companies who provide them a plethora of information and leads that they just don't have the time to run down themselves.