News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sarals

02/12/04 6:47 PM

#36323 RE: Churak #36321

Great post Churak and I totally agree!
icon url

BullNBear52

02/12/04 6:54 PM

#36324 RE: Churak #36321

Too bad if someone doesn't like what I have to say about an issue.

So that gives you the right to post what ever you feel like regarding other people? lol.

Get back to square 1 first.
icon url

chwdrhed

02/12/04 7:01 PM

#36325 RE: Churak #36321

I think I agree with you. (Huh?)

I believe part of the motivation on the part of those who want to have a banning feature is to be able to say publicly that which cannot be rebutted publicly.

If this is not the case there would be no objection to a private board being visible only to those invited to post there.

My suggestion is, I believe, the reverse of the current test. Rather than allow the mods to ban on a so-called private board allow them to invite. In other words they have to individually select each member allowed to post on that board. Those not listed don't see it.

Obviously this would constitute a new kind of board here and would have to be selected that way when the board was created.


icon url

Susie924

02/12/04 9:13 PM

#36365 RE: Churak #36321

You're pretty good when you put your mind to it.
icon url

Vexari

02/12/04 11:09 PM

#36390 RE: Churak #36321

Churak..agreed..

RB uses the ignore..

with limited intervention..


that's why its free..


it is when you have a judge involved that this issue gets abused..