Replies to post #242 on Carefree Group Inc (CRFU)

[youhavenoidea]

THIS NEW RELEASE IS HILARIOUS

NO MENTION OF WHAT THEY NET, JUST GROSS LOL..IT COULD BE LOSING MONEY AND ON ITS WAY INTO CH11.

IT ADDS 10M IN REVS BUT WHAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE?? WHO GIVES A HOOT ON THE GROSS, MEANS NOTHING, NADA

WHAT A SCAM

WHAT A JOKE..ANYTHING TO PUMP THIS POS ..PLUS IT'S JUST AN LOI.

Synesi, Inc. Announces Letter of Intent to Acquire Aviation Flight Services, LLC
Acquisition to Add More Than $10 Million in Annual Revenue

Synesi, Inc. (PINK SHEETS: SYNS) announced that it has executed a letter of intent to acquire Aviation Flight Services of Fort Lauderdale, FL and New York, NY.

AFS (www.aviationfs.com) is an industry leader in aviation business services. AFS offers a premium charter service with one of the most comprehensive range of personalized luxury services in the industry. Additionally, AFS provides aviation management and logistical systems including ground handling, administrative support, fuel servicing, weather and flight planning, and a full array of airport and in-flight services for passenger, cargo and business flights worldwide. For the period ending December 31, 2006, AFS reported more than $9.5 million in gross revenue.

“This acquisition represents our further diversification throughout related industries. AFS complements Carefree aviation services in every way. It is a perfect fit,” said Synesi, Inc. President Anthony Marotta.

About Synesi, Inc. and Carefree Elite: Carefree Elite® delivers an unsurpassed experience of luxury in accommodation, travel, entertainment, personal security, and premiere concierge services to its elite clientele. Members enjoy unrivaled privileges through the exclusive use of Carefree’s inventory of luxury properties, exotic cars, yachts, private aircrafts, and superior concierge services and amenities.

For more information visit www.carefreeelite.com and www.carefreelifestyle.com.

This release includes forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the impact of competitive products, the ability to meet customer demand, the ability to manage growth, acquisitions of technology, equipment, or human resources, the effect of economic and business conditions, and the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel. The Company is not obligated to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.

Synesi, Inc., Miami Beach
Investor Relations:
Edgar Ward, 866-800-1007
[e-mail]
www.carefreeelite.com




Source: Business Wire (October 11, 2007 - 6:57 AM EST)

News by QuoteMedia
www.quotemedia.com

[youhavenoidea]

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE*
Dear Sir or Madam:
Thank you for your recent e-mail to the group electronic mailbox of the Division of Enforcement at the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. We appreciate your taking the time to write to us. This automated response confirms that the Division of Enforcement has received your e-mail. You can rest assured that an attorney in the Office of Internet Enforcement will review your e-mail promptly.

We are always interested in hearing from members of the public, and you may be assured that the matter you have raised is being given careful consideration in view of the Commission's overall enforcement responsibilities under the federal securities laws. It is, however, the Commission's policy to conduct its inquiries on a non-public basis -- so this may be the only response that you receive. If your complaint is more in the nature of a consumer complaint (such as a dispute with your broker or a problem with your brokerage or retirement account), you should contact our Office of Investor Education and Assistance -- they may be able to help you. You may reach the Office of Investor Education and Assistance via telephone at [phone]or through the Web at HYPERLINK "http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml"www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml.

The Commission conducts its investigations on a non-public basis to preserve the integrity of its investigative process as well as to protect persons against whom unfounded charges may be made or against whom the Commission determines that enforcement action is not necessary or appropriate. Subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, we cannot disclose to you any information which we may gather and we cannot confirm to you the existence or non-existence of an investigation, unless made a matter of public record in proceedings brought before the Commission or in the courts.

If you are unsure where you should direct your inquiry or you want to learn more about how the SEC handles inquiries and complaints, please visit the SEC Complaint Center at HYPERLINK "http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml"www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml.

Should you have any additional information or questions pertaining to this matter, please feel free to communicate directly with us at HYPERLINK "mailto:[e-mail]"[e-mail].

We appreciate your interest in the work of the Commission and its Division of Enforcement.
Very truly yours,
S/
John Reed Stark
Chief, Office of Internet Enforcement
United States Securities & Exchange Commission

[youhavenoidea]

You can rest assured that an attorney in the Office of Internet Enforcement will review your e-mail promptly

HMMMMMM..Can't wait when they (3 letter folks) check their books and records..

Any paper shredders around LOL

[youhavenoidea]

SYNS SHAREHOLDERS BETTER PRAY THAT SYNS ISN'T PAYING (WHICH I THINK THEY ARE) ANY BROKERS,ETC ETC

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 20325 / October 9, 2007

SEC v. Smart Online, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 07-CV-07960 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y.)

Court Permanently Enjoins Smart Online, Inc. in Broker-Bribery Scheme

On October 2, 2007, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a consent judgment against defendant Smart Online, Inc. ("Smart Online") in an action filed last month by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's complaint, Smart Online consented to the entry of a judgment by the Honorable P. Kevin Castel permanently enjoining Smart Online from further violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws, specifically Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933.

The Commission's complaint alleged that between May 2005 and January 2006, Smart Online's CEO, Michael Nouri, paid over $170,000 to stock brokers, including defendants Anthony Martin, James Doolan, Ruben Serrano, and Alain Lustig, to solicit customers to purchase Smart Online stock in order to qualify the company for listing on the NASDAQ by increasing the number of shareholders and trading volume of Smart Online stock. The complaint further alleged that Michael Nouri concealed the bribes as "consulting fees" paid pursuant to sham consulting agreements.

The litigation is continuing against the remaining defendants.

For further information, see Litigation Release No. 20276 (Sept. 12, 2007).



http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2007/lr20325.htm


U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 20276 / September 12, 2007

SEC v. Smart Online, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 07-CV-07960 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y.)

SEC Charges Smart Online, Its President and CEO Dennis Michael Nouri, and Five Others in Connection With a Broker-Bribery Scheme.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a civil injunctive action against Smart Online, its CEO and president, Dennis Michael Nouri ("Michael Nouri"), Michael Nouri's brother, Reeza Eric Nouri ("Eric Nouri"), and four brokers, alleging that Michael and Eric Nouri paid cash bribes to the brokers to sell Smart Online stock to create volume and demand for the Smart Online's stock.

The complaint alleges that Smart Online stock began trading publicly on the OTC Bulletin Board in April 2005. Defendant Michael Nouri, the CEO of Smart Online, sought to qualify the company for listing on the NASDAQ by increasing the number of shareholders and trading volume of Smart Online stock. In order to do so, Michael Nouri began paying bribes to stock brokers, including defendants Anthony Martin, James Doolan, Ruben Serrano, and Alain Lustig, to solicit customers to purchase Smart Online stock.

The complaint alleges that between May 2005 and January 2006, Michael Nouri paid over $170,000 to brokers who sold more than 267,000 shares of Smart Online stock (or approximately 10% of the trading volume during the period) to investors. The complaint also alleges Eric Nouri, an employee of Smart Online, also negotiated bribe payments with a broker to solicit purchases of stock at various amounts and prices. Michael Nouri concealed the bribes as "consulting fees" paid pursuant to sham consulting agreements. The complaint further alleges that the brokers did not disclose to their customers that they were receiving bribes to sell Smart Online stock, and that Michael Nouri understood that the brokers were concealing the bribes from their customers.

By late 2005, Smart Online had qualified for listing on the NASDAQ. On January 17, 2006, the day that Smart Online was scheduled to begin trading on the NASDAQ, the Commission suspended trading of the stock. Smart Online stock did not trade on the NASDAQ.

The complaint charges the defendants with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In its enforcement action, the Commission is seeking an order permanently enjoining the defendants from committing future violations of the foregoing federal securities laws and a final judgment ordering the individual defendants to disgorge their ill-gotten gains and to pay civil penalties. The Commission is also seeking an order permanently baring Michael Nouri from serving as an officer or director of a public company.

The Commission's investigation is continuing.

SEC Complaint in this matter

[youhavenoidea]

I WONDER HOW MR EDGAR WARD..SYNS'S IR DEPT IS GETTING PAID??

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23607077