News Focus
News Focus
icon url

griz

10/08/07 2:05 AM

#74158 RE: d indian #74157

Fair enough DI. I have no beef with you. Just getting tired of hearing the narrow minded cheap-shots by posters on this board who don't seem to be thinking for themselves. Very few posters conduct any of their own DD.

As for your comments such as "AURC SEZ, DOVGAN SEZ, don't mean anything." Those could be relavent to what has been/is posted by the moderators on this Ihub website, or by anonymous posters on this website. However, I don't understand the correlation between your stated objections about Aurus and the information on the Aurus Corp. website.

I also have difficulty understanding why you post repeatedly about Aurus having no credibility and their management not being trustworthy. Parkin created the mistrust, not Aurus's Russian management. Credibility is not a touchy-feely type thing. Even after being in a McDonalds, I'd question their credibility about saying they sold billions of hambergers. Only the fact that there's a MikiDees on every corner of every city does it seem plausable. None of us have been to the tailings piles, except for 2C's wife. That doesn't mean they don't exist and don't contain PMs in revenue producing amounts.

You also stated "The share price will continue to be the barometer, of AURC'S creditability, and if company, or management can be trusted." I don't believe that is true. The past and present SP are more a function of pump and dump tactics on this and other websites. That.......will end very soon.
icon url

benzdealeror2

10/08/07 2:07 AM

#74159 RE: d indian #74157

Time has answered one thing..

The O/S in Dec 2005 was only 103 million. It has more than tripled in 18 months.
icon url

cigarman

10/08/07 7:08 AM

#74172 RE: d indian #74157

Mr. Indian. Since you understand everything you read and comprehend it. Here is a quote from a post of yours in September.

Story of AURC. No verifiable production, no dividends, no buyout, no shareholder's meeting. And the final straw again. NO TRANSFER AGENT, that wants to claim that position.

My understanding is you were wrong in your assessment.