I just sent you this in a private message so I copied it and put it here too after I noticed you also posted on the board.
MisterEC, I'm not going to debate you on this. That is the worst site I've ever come across in the 6 years I've been researching. I used to go point by point through that website pointing out the lies and deceptions but I finally gave up. It's worse than Popular Mechanic's hit piece. Enjoy your life, and pretend that what this man meant is that he wanted to pull out the firemen in spite of the fact that all the firemen had left WTC-7 by around 11 in the morning. http://vestigialconscience.com/PullIt.mp3
I'm going to add that the writer of your puff piece starts off with "The mechanics of the collapse are really much more simple than conspiracy theorists would like you to believe."
It's such an absurd statement when one considers that the World Trade Center's three buildings are the only steel structured high rises that have ever collapsed due to fire. Here are real fires that lasted much, much longer but they buildings did not collapse. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=20966549
MisterEC, I'm tossing in this older post of mine........
A lead engineer at NIST, John L. Gross, and the lead guy in Project 6 claiming there was no molten metal. John Gross was tasked with finding out how the buildings fell. Scroll down to play video in this link: http://911blogger.com/node/6104 Just found the actual video: