Ok, but I still don't understand the logic of hiring an American based respected accounting firm to audit you and then retaining a NY based law firm to represent you against those involved with the prior merger if you yourself are the one hiding anything. It simply doesn't seem logical or plausible. These actions at least on the surface appear to be directed at facilitating the truth, not obscurring it.
A liar simply doesn't volunteer to get hooked up to a lie detector does he?
If the company's intent is to sell or issue more shares, would it not have been easier to do it while having a much bigger number outstanding? I mean what is another million shares issued when you have a billion out?
Now with only 12 million shares out, haven't they actually negated their ability to recklessly issue more shares and not have it make a material impact on the total share count?
SM
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
