News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Drugdoctor

09/28/07 5:38 PM

#3107 RE: Wondering Skeptic #3106

Sure they could, but since they own about 25% of the shares, what do you think the chances of that happenning is? LMAO
icon url

Tops $ Bottoms

09/28/07 6:11 PM

#3122 RE: Wondering Skeptic #3106

LMAO "could"

Is that not included in the forward looking statments act in the prs too. COULD, PLAN, INTEND>>> I could go on but they put that in there for a reason just like the prs.

MAN dude it's penny land,

YOU HAVE NO clue LMAO



j
icon url

skiytreem9u

09/29/07 5:00 PM

#3234 RE: Wondering Skeptic #3106

Are you sure that's not boiler plate wording typically in charters? Besides, it states "could" delay or prevent an acqusition of the company; not "will" prevent.

It may be just them keeping their options open.
icon url

skiytreem9u

09/29/07 5:09 PM

#3236 RE: Wondering Skeptic #3106

I did a google search on the phrase:

"Could Delay Or Prevent An Acquisition Of Our Company".

Interesting. That phrase isn't specific to only COPI.

LOL!!