News Focus
News Focus
icon url

keegers

09/25/07 12:39 PM

#29072 RE: Verapan #29063

It very well could have had a stipulation, although I dont know if it did because these agreements were made before the release of those monumental SWARM numbers. My guess though is that Paul and Co. made this move before such stipulations were necessary. Also, I think this move allows any further agreements to not need this kind of language. I am just basing this on the feeling I would get if I was on the other side of the coin (the brokerages) . An analogy that comes to mind is the height requirement for amusement rides. SWARM is like a pair of big shoes that allows SPOOZ to be tall enough to ride the big kids ride (the ride to big profits) and their dealing brokerages would be 6 inches short of the height requirement. So SPOOZ sells them special shoes(STv2 w/Fractalz module) which will make them taller. SPOOZ hops back on the ride, and the brokerages are left there only to realize that they are just 1 inch shy. That would leave some pretty bad tastes in the mouthes of others.
icon url

Imperial Whazoo

09/25/07 2:38 PM

#29122 RE: Verapan #29063

An interesting thought...

Maybe one of the internal problems Spooz faced ut could not talk about was theed to address a potential conflict of interest before they could proceed and begin announcing some of the deals they spoke about haveing in place as far back as the shareholder's meeting.

So, the important thing about this PR today isn't what it directly says but what the formalization of this separate entity means in terms of clearing away inernal structural problems that impeded the release of previously hinted at news.

Imperial Whazoo