Its pretty darn obvious that the Harrow lumberyard was not profitable and probably had been losing money for years.
But I thought they were already making enough profits for NASD??? One of the PRs said so, and I know I certainly relied on it, among some of the other now questionable ones, in buying my shares.
Some of the proceeds of the Nominee Accounts invariably went to pay of the accumulated debts of Harrow.
But wait. If they were already making enough profits for NASD (at a $4 of $5 per share threshold), as announced in a PR last summer, why in the world would they have needed to journal hundreds of millions of unregistered shares into nominee accounts and then manipulate trading, transfer/withdrawn millions of dollars to who know who or where, then claim they needed money to pay down company debt or expand the business? That doesn't make sense with all those astronomical profits.
You can't have it both ways.