News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #960 on Biotech Values
icon url

DewDiligence

01/23/04 2:06 PM

#961 RE: mskatiescarletohara #960

katie: BMY pulled out in 2001:

http://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=OXGN&script=413&layout=0&item_id=...

However, I do not think we can assume that BMY’s motive had to do with toxicity. Another explanation is that BMY was undergoing a corporate overhaul and was desperately searching for ways to inflate the 2002 EPS. (As we now know, BMY stuffed the inventory channels to give the appearance of robust sales.) Because CA4P was clearly not a near-term earning driver, it is possible that BMY’s decision to pull out was based on short-term financial considerations.

Then again, maybe BMY did see something in CA4P’s safety profile that was not to their liking. If you read the OXGN message board from that period (10/01), there were some posters who indeed thought that toxicity was the reason for the pullout.

icon url

mid_swe

01/24/04 12:01 PM

#972 RE: mskatiescarletohara #960

katie, I have been in and out in OXGN for several years but as a daytrader or for a maximum period of one month. Have been long since mid 2003.
This is what I found regarding the BMY agreement.

Despite the positive results, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. ended its partnership with Oxigene on CA4P last week in a decision to focus on late-stage products, according to OxiGene.

http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&board=7077146&tid=oxgn&sid=7077146&acti...

Note that cardiac toxicity has been discussed before, in July 2003 and back in 2002 and in October 2001.

I am in and out in MAXM. Know MAXM good but not as in depth as for OXGN.