Kron,
There is no question that taxation is necessary for the provision of essential government services and that taxation hinders productivity. So, the debate has always been about the proper level of taxation, and the fairest, most equitable way to levy it.
But both you and Sox are on the same side in arguing that there is a public duty of each person producing at a maximum level. How do you know that the taxes that I do pay, such as sales and excise taxes don't pay for the government services that i do consume. If the GNP rises by 20%, are we 20% better off? Is income an accurate barometer of a person's contribution to society? Suppose I earn 3 million dollars this year, by swindling unsophisticated investors? Have I made a positive contribution to society. When I am out sailing, and am passed by a large yacht, which of us is polluting the marine environment?
If you studied economics, you know about the concept of marginal utility. If you are homeless, any dwelling adds tremendous utility. If you don't have a car, any old car that runs adds tremendous utility. Once you have a 5,000 square foot home, it's hard to argue that there is tremendous utility derived from a 5,500 square foot home. If you have 5 TVs in your home, do you really need a sixth? I don't see any reason at all to feel that if all of those of us who seek a simpler way of life, reentered the ratrace, that life would improve for others. I believe the opposite is true. But that is a choice each of us has to make. And yes, in my younger days, when I was supporting a family, this way of life was not an option, now it is.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
