Stocky, This news taken by itself, leaves me ambivalent at best. burdening another associated entity with DNAG debt (before it even officially exists) as a stand alone manuever doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy feeling about DNAG financing talks or eventual acceptance in the marketplace.
IF (and this is a BIG "if") it is a precursor to other more friendly financing than that remains to be seen. But the fact remains Gabriel issued a statement that answered few questions and raised many more. He (and the company) have a long history of such weasley statements. If they hadn't screwed with shareholders for so many years already, I believe shareholders would have more understanding.