News Focus
News Focus
icon url

I-6GM

07/30/07 6:52 PM

#4111 RE: bradan #4110

One major difference, I can post as just another shareholder, I am not an officier, Board member, major shareholder or possess any inside information. Therefore, I can speak freely. A corporate officer that communicates by any mechanism other than 10K, 10Q or 8K is not being fair to all of the shareholders. Answering emails is bad, giving any information is worst.
The biggest reason for me to want to see I-6 go forward is I own about 26% of the outstanding stock IF it can be registered with the SEC. I do not need a shell. You get accepted the old fashion way, by filing.
As far as Niteagle, the answer is I was responding to one of the posts that list Niteagle royalties as one of the things I stole. I have heard zero from them in two years.
When you state EVS is obselete technology you are way off base. It is not the technology that has failed, it is the process of bring EVS to the right market. EVS is best suited for the part 135 regional airline market that operate out of small poorly equipped airport. These operators run 12-15 cycles per day, operating on Cat I air strips, they are the ones that need help. Kollsman does not see it my way.
And lastly, who asked you to believe me? Not me. I just filling in some blanks. Some people appreciate it other do not.