News Focus
News Focus
icon url

OriginalFred

07/29/07 5:21 PM

#4096 RE: I-6GM #4095

I-6GM:

I enjoyed reading your response to Cyto, and I must chime in. I am a past holder of AVTX, but I sold when I realized the royalty stream was not what I expected. I continue to follow the company out of curiosity.

I think some people are a little angry at you in regards to who owns what. Since I do not own the stock, maybe I can ask the question in an objective manner.

From what I understand, old AVTX stock holders own the following after the reverse merger:
1. Their portion of the 6.5% of the frog juice company.
2. Their portion of I-6 (eventually)

You will own the same as above in addition to the EVS royalty stream. Is this correct?

If this is correct, what do you expect the EVS royalty stream to be going forward? Are you disappointed by EVS royalties and Kollsman?

I think this is why some of your share holders are upset. They bought the stock in order to own the EVS royalty stream, but they instead own 6.5% of the frog juice company. Maybe this was a good trade. I assume you believe that this was indeed in the best interest of the share holders. Am I right?

-Fred
icon url

Cytotekk

07/29/07 6:15 PM

#4097 RE: I-6GM #4095

I-6, absolutely unreal assumptions? Not at all.

I-6 is not approved at this time and may not be. What goes into I-6 stays in I-6, you say.

Don't answer, but what happens to I-6 if you are not approved by the SEC?

Mr. Ball, you may well do very well with your frog stock and since I seem to know more about them and Ausbanking than you do, you should be happy I pointed that out.

The royalties are an issue with us all, that is what we bought, not Chinese Hasma. You should understand that, until I-6 is a shareholder reality, I-6 is yours.

I have, and has always epressed my own opinions and pose my own questions Mr. Ball. I have no henchmen, do you?

Good luck to you Mr. Ball. I have appreciated your participation on this board.