Your attempt at rapproachment is appreciated.
I am a supporter of Dew and am also concerned about possible hidden agendas. It also seems PC is fluent in CC tech. We all form opinions none of which necessarly reflects absolute truth. It is possible for a post to reflect a certain amount of science yet create confusion and dissention by raising issues which are truly irrelivent. Or by another tack create immaginary goals which are unrealistic and do not in any way reflect the goals of management, but if these imaginary goals are excepted by readers lead to the conclusion the company has little chance of suceeding.
For example: The issue Atryn's glycolisation patterns has been rendered moot by the decision of the EMEA. The simple answer is they are ok.
For example: Replacement of CHO cell culture protein production by transgenic goat production is not one of GTCB's goals. Cell culture production is deeply entrenched with previously mentioned layers of bureaucratic resisence and livlyhoods on the line not to mention tradition. The horse was not replaced overnight. GTCB will do very well operating where no cell culture dares to go. Believe me, there is plenty of room. Will GTCB eventually replace CC. No one knows.
Who controls the Spice, controls the universe.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
