News Focus
News Focus
icon url

janice shell

07/22/07 2:45 AM

#277516 RE: Grande25 #277513

Okay, thanks. Hadn't seen your post when I made mine.
icon url

boogaloo

07/22/07 2:51 AM

#277518 RE: Grande25 #277513

So does that mean that the super special info which was previously given about the audit nearing completion was erroneous? Was it a lie, or mistake, or misunderstanding? It sounds like a pretty simple question and answer.

That further backs up my stance that "calling the company" (or any company, in pinkyville) isn't necessarily a reliable means of DD. I have a feeling that a few folks are starting to realize that.
icon url

Melvin Chizedek

07/22/07 7:15 AM

#277525 RE: Grande25 #277513

Grande-but Leslie has been channeling various posters for months saying that the audit results would be released any day.

Don't you find that troubling? And given the light an audit could shed on the OSC charges, don't you find that even more troubling?

Since SLJB has no source of revenue, and had no initial capitalization, I'll wager that they don't have the money to even pay a retainer, and that the announcement was simply a way to generate volume that DV could dump into.