Way wrong answer Mar-key.
First: Hearing it, reading it, forward-looking is forward looking. Besides you don't hear the K/Q reports. Can you now see where your mistake was?
Mar-key I have fallen for the exact same thing you fell for. I did so when I first became involed with sub-penny stocks.
Second (and most important) - I didn't fall for any hype. If you'll notice early on when I started posting one of my main concerns was to verify what I had seen, not heard. I did get a lot of good help from this board too, BTW. This stock, just like any other sub-penny came up on my radar when it was < .002. I typically don't even bother with these types of stocks > than that amount. With that, I also trade back and forth (something you do now and probably should have done from the beginning). Why? To make money. As I said before I am not long and have never been 100% loyal to any company becasue I didn't build it and am not associated with its inner workings. Bottom line. However, of all the sub-penny stocks I've invested in, this is one of the very few, and I mean very few, that has a real, servicable product. I believe that without dilution, the pps can achieve value on its on although limited. This company has established consitent growth over the last 3 years and dilution has offset the effect. Oh well, such is normally the case with subpenny stocks.
The reports are out there Mar-key and I'm waiting for the next one. The first two so far have been consistent (growthwise) but not great. I expect the same from the next one. The key is to understanding is that what is planned is just that, planned. What accomplished and completed is fact.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
