Stock
You that last post would have been al little easier if you had summed it up. Let me see if I can understand
You highlighted the following as exclusions:
1. [applicable to tax evasion offenses?] - don't see where this applies in this case
2. Exclusions. Except to the extent otherwise specifically provided by rule, regulation, or order of the Commission, this section shall not apply to a forward-looking statement-- was convicted of any felony or misdemeanor described in clauses (i) through (iv) of section 15 (b)(4)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; [applicable to tax evasion offenses?] or
has been made the subject of a judicial or administrative decree or order arising out of a governmental action that----issues penny stock; - Still don't see where this applies here or even Raven Moon but this should indeed apply to Kevin Sullivan & Co.
3. As for the rest of your points in bold to sum it up, you should have highlighted this part:
the forward-looking statement is--
identified as a forward-looking statement, and is accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statement
When the company either puts together a pr, report, or even a webcast that absolutely declares there will be no R/S regardless of the company's status, then litigation we be correct. As long as these statements are made the applicable "escape clauses" litigation is not likely to occur.
Stock I really do enjoy these dicussions. You really put my mind to work.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
